Skip to content

Marketing & consumer behavior

Perceived value scale: PERVAL and Dodds (1991)

Concept
Perceived Value
Field
Marketing & consumer behavior
Scales in the library
6
Items
27

Perceived value is a customer's evaluation of what they receive compared with what they give up, including money, time, and effort. Zeithaml (1988) defined it as a trade-off between benefits and costs; Sweeney and Soutar (2001) extended it into four dimensions: quality, emotional, price, and social. The concept sits within the price-quality-value model of Dodds et al. (1991), Sheth's theory of consumption values, and UTAUT2. Common topics: perceived value of clean food, fashion, ride-hailing services, and e-wallets.

Comparing the scales

ScaleAuthor (year)ItemsResponse formatWhen to use it
Quality Value (Functional Value, Performance/Quality) (QV) Perceived value scale (PERVAL) Sweeney & Soutar (2001) 6 Likert 7-point Choose when measuring multidimensional value with PERVAL; QV is the quality dimension, best used together with EV, PV, and SV.
Emotional Value (EV) Perceived value scale (PERVAL) Sweeney & Soutar (2001) 5 Likert 7-point Choose when the product has an emotional or enjoyment element, such as fashion, cosmetics, or travel.
Price Value (Functional Value, Price/Value for Money) (PV) Perceived value scale (PERVAL) Sweeney & Soutar (2001) 4 Likert 7-point Choose when you want to isolate the price evaluation within the PERVAL model.
Social Value (SV) Perceived value scale (PERVAL) Sweeney & Soutar (2001) 4 Likert 7-point Choose when the product is tied to self-image before others, such as luxury brands or premium phones.
Perceived Value (PV) Willingness to buy scale Dodds, Monroe & Grewal (1991) 5 Likert 7-point Choose when you need unidimensional perceived value in the price, quality, purchase intention model of Dodds et al.
Price Value (PV) UTAUT2 scale Venkatesh et al. (2012) 3 Likert 7-point Choose for paid technology under UTAUT2, such as an English-learning app or a music streaming service.

Items of each scale

Original English wording from the published source. Replace placeholders such as [system] or [brand] with what your study is about, and pilot the questionnaire with 20 to 30 respondents first.

Quality Value (Functional Value, Performance/Quality) (QV) · Perceived value scale (PERVAL)

CodeItem
QV1 [Product] has consistent quality.
QV2 [Product] is well made.
QV3 [Product] has an acceptable standard of quality.
QV4 (R) [Product] has poor workmanship.
QV5 (R) [Product] would not last a long time.
QV6 [Product] would perform consistently.

Source: Sweeney & Soutar (2001). Response scale, licence and APA reference: Perceived value scale (PERVAL).

Emotional Value (EV) · Perceived value scale (PERVAL)

CodeItem
EV1 [Product] is one that I would enjoy.
EV2 [Product] would make me want to use it.
EV3 [Product] is one that I would feel relaxed about using.
EV4 [Product] would make me feel good.
EV5 [Product] would give me pleasure.

Source: Sweeney & Soutar (2001). Response scale, licence and APA reference: Perceived value scale (PERVAL).

Price Value (Functional Value, Price/Value for Money) (PV) · Perceived value scale (PERVAL)

CodeItem
PV1 [Product] is reasonably priced.
PV2 [Product] offers value for money.
PV3 [Product] is a good product for the price.
PV4 [Product] would be economical.

Source: Sweeney & Soutar (2001). Response scale, licence and APA reference: Perceived value scale (PERVAL).

Social Value (SV) · Perceived value scale (PERVAL)

CodeItem
SV1 [Product] would help me to feel acceptable.
SV2 [Product] would improve the way I am perceived.
SV3 [Product] would make a good impression on other people.
SV4 [Product] would give its owner social approval.

Source: Sweeney & Soutar (2001). Response scale, licence and APA reference: Perceived value scale (PERVAL).

Perceived Value (PV) · Willingness to buy scale

CodeItem
PV1 This product is a: (very good … very poor) value for the money.
PV2 At the price shown the product is: (very economical … very uneconomical).
PV3 The product is considered to be a very good buy.
PV4 The price shown for the product is: (very acceptable … very unacceptable).
PV5 The product appears to be a bargain.

Source: Dodds, Monroe & Grewal (1991). Response scale, licence and APA reference: Willingness to buy scale.

Price Value (PV) · UTAUT2 scale

CodeItem
PV1 [mobile Internet] is reasonably priced.
PV2 [mobile Internet] is a good value for the money.
PV3 At the current price, [mobile Internet] provides a good value.

Source: Venkatesh et al. (2012). Response scale, licence and APA reference: UTAUT2 scale.

(R): reverse-coded item; recode before analysis. Perceived value scale (PERVAL): 1–7 scale: new score = 1 + 7 − score = 8 − score; 1–5 scale: new score = 1 + 5 − score = 6 − score.

Tips

Once you have a scale, put the concept in the research model drawer to state your hypotheses, work out the minimum sample size, and after data collection check reliability with the Cronbach's alpha calculator.

Frequently asked questions

Is perceived value unidimensional or multidimensional?

Both are used. Dodds et al. (1991) measure value as a unidimensional construct. Sweeney and Soutar (2001) measure it with 4 dimensions. Choose by your research question: use PERVAL if you want to know which dimension matters.

How does perceived value differ from perceived price?

Perceived price is only an evaluation of the price level. Perceived value compares the benefits received with the costs paid, so an expensive product can still have high perceived value.

How do I use PERVAL in PLS-SEM?

You can enter the 4 dimensions as 4 separate independent variables, or model perceived value as a second-order construct with 4 first-order dimensions. The second approach requires stating the method clearly (repeated indicators or two-stage).

Related concepts