Skip to content

Scale library · HRM & organizational behavior

In-role performance scale: Williams & Anderson (1991)

Williams and Anderson's (1991) in-role behavior scale measures how far an employee fulfils the duties in the job description. It was developed together with the OCBI and OCBO citizenship scales to separate required from voluntary behavior. The items are written in the third person, so supervisors can rate employees, or the items can be adapted for self-rating. It is a common outcome in theses on leadership, engagement, empowerment and job satisfaction.

Cite the original, not the blog.

Original English items

Items marked (R) are reverse-coded: recode them before computing reliability or scale scores. Replace bracketed placeholders such as [system] with the name of the system, brand or organization you study.

In-Role Behavior (IRB, 7 items)

Code Item wording Reverse-coded
IRB1 Adequately completes assigned duties No
IRB2 Fulfills responsibilities specified in job description No
IRB3 Performs tasks that are expected of him No
IRB4 Meets formal performance requirements of the job No
IRB5 Engages in activities that will directly affect his performance evaluation No
IRB6 (R) Neglects aspects of the job he is obligated to perform Yes
IRB7 (R) Fails to perform essential duties Yes

Response scale

Agreement scale, usually 5 or 7 points (1 = Strongly disagree … 5 or 7 = Strongly agree) in studies reusing it. Reverse-score IRB6 and IRB7 before computing the mean.

Recoding reverse-coded items: 1–5 scale: new score = 1 + 5 − score = 6 − score; 1–7 scale: new score = 1 + 7 − score = 8 − score.

Licence and permission

The items are published in the original article in the Journal of Management and widely used in research; we found no specific terms of use from the authors. Cite the original article.

Sources (APA 7)

Vietnamese translation

A Vietnamese translation of every item, with sample-size advice and studies that used the scale, is on the Vietnamese page for this scale.

Back to all scales