Skip to content

Scale library · Technology & information systems

IS continuance model (ECM): Bhattacherjee (2001)

The ECM was proposed by Bhattacherjee (2001) to explain why users continue or stop using a system after initial acceptance. When actual experience exceeds expectations (confirmation), users find the system more useful and are more satisfied, and satisfaction and perceived usefulness jointly drive continuance intention. The original study surveyed online banking customers; the items here come from the fully reported adaptation by Vedadi and Warkentin (2016) for mobile banking apps. It suits theses on continued use of e-wallets, banking apps, online learning and food delivery apps.

Cite the original, not the blog.

Original English items

Items marked (R) are reverse-coded: recode them before computing reliability or scale scores. Replace bracketed placeholders such as [system] with the name of the system, brand or organization you study.

Confirmation (CONF, 3 items)

Code Item wording Reverse-coded
CONF1 My experience with using [mobile banking applications] was better than what I expected. No
CONF2 The service level provided by [mobile banking applications] was better than what I expected. No
CONF3 Overall, most of my expectations from using [mobile banking applications] were confirmed. No

Perceived Usefulness (PU, 4 items)

Code Item wording Reverse-coded
PU1 Using [mobile banking applications] improves my performance in managing personal finances. No
PU2 Using [mobile banking applications] increases my productivity in managing personal finances. No
PU3 Using [mobile banking applications] enhances my effectiveness in managing personal finances. No
PU4 Overall, [mobile banking applications] is useful in managing personal finances. No

Satisfaction (SAT, 4 items)

Code Item wording Reverse-coded
SAT1 Very dissatisfied/Very satisfied No
SAT2 Very displeased/Very pleased No
SAT3 Very frustrated/Very contented No
SAT4 Absolutely terrible/Absolutely delighted No

Continuance Intention (CI, 3 items)

Code Item wording Reverse-coded
CI1 I intend to continue using [mobile banking applications] rather than discontinue its use. No
CI2 My intentions are to continue using [mobile banking applications] than use any alternative means (traditional or web-based banking). No
CI3 (R) If I could, I would like to discontinue my use of [mobile banking applications]. Yes

Response scale

7-point scales. CONF, PU and CI use a 7-point agreement scale (1 = Strongly disagree … 7 = Strongly agree); SAT uses four 7-point semantic differential pairs (for example 1 = Very dissatisfied … 7 = Very satisfied), following Vedadi and Warkentin (2016).

Recoding reverse-coded items: 1–7 scale: new score = 1 + 7 − score = 8 − score; 1–5 scale: new score = 1 + 5 − score = 6 − score.

Licence and permission

The items are published in the appendix of an academic article (Vedadi & Warkentin, 2016) and in Bhattacherjee's (2001) original article. Cite both; we found no permission requirement for non-commercial academic use.

Sources (APA 7)

Vietnamese translation

A Vietnamese translation of every item, with sample-size advice and studies that used the scale, is on the Vietnamese page for this scale.

Back to all scales