HR & organizational behavior
Person-organization fit (P-O fit): meaning and scale
- Concept
- Person-Organization Fit
- Field
- HR & organizational behavior
- Scales in the library
- 3
- Items
- 9
Person-organization fit is the degree to which employees see their values as similar to the organization's values. Cable and DeRue (2002) directly measure perceptions of three types of fit: between personal and organizational values (P-O fit), between personal needs and what the job provides (needs-supplies fit), and between abilities and job demands (demands-abilities fit); the last two are often combined as person-job fit (P-J fit). In Vietnam, the concept suits studies on recruitment, engagement, satisfaction and turnover intention.
Comparing the scales
| Scale | Author (year) | Items | Response format | When to use it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Person-Organization Fit (POF) Perceived fit scale (P-O, P-J) | Cable & DeRue (2002) | 3 | Likert 7-point | Person-organization fit, 3 items. |
| Needs-Supplies Fit (NSF) Perceived fit scale (P-O, P-J) | Cable & DeRue (2002) | 3 | Likert 7-point | Needs-supplies fit, 3 items. |
| Demands-Abilities Fit (DAF) Perceived fit scale (P-O, P-J) | Cable & DeRue (2002) | 3 | Likert 7-point | Demands-abilities fit, 3 items. |
Items of each scale
Original English wording from the published source. Replace placeholders such as [system] or
[brand] with what your study is about, and pilot the questionnaire with 20 to 30 respondents first.
Person-Organization Fit (POF) · Perceived fit scale (P-O, P-J)
| Code | Item |
|---|---|
| POF1 | The things that I value in life are very similar to the things that my organization values. |
| POF2 | My personal values match my organization’s values and culture. |
| POF3 | My organization’s values and culture provide a good fit with the things that I value in life. |
Source: Cable & DeRue (2002). Response scale, licence and APA reference: Perceived fit scale (P-O, P-J).
Needs-Supplies Fit (NSF) · Perceived fit scale (P-O, P-J)
| Code | Item |
|---|---|
| NSF1 | There is a good fit between what my job offers me and what I am looking for in a job. |
| NSF2 | The attributes that I look for in a job are fulfilled very well by my present job. |
| NSF3 | The job that I currently hold gives me just about everything that I want from a job. |
Source: Cable & DeRue (2002). Response scale, licence and APA reference: Perceived fit scale (P-O, P-J).
Demands-Abilities Fit (DAF) · Perceived fit scale (P-O, P-J)
| Code | Item |
|---|---|
| DAF1 | The match is very good between the demands of my job and my personal skills. |
| DAF2 | My abilities and training are a good fit with the requirements of my job. |
| DAF3 | My personal abilities and education provide a good match with the demands that my job places on me. |
Source: Cable & DeRue (2002). Response scale, licence and APA reference: Perceived fit scale (P-O, P-J).
Tips
- Choose the type of fit that matches your hypothesis: POF for values and culture; NSF for whether the job meets needs; DAF for whether abilities suffice for the job.
- Each type has only 3 items; check loadings carefully before dropping any item.
- The three types correlate with each other; test discriminant validity with HTMT if you include all three in the model.
- The original scale uses 7 points.
Once you have a scale, put the concept in the research model drawer to state your hypotheses, work out the minimum sample size, and after data collection check reliability with the Cronbach's alpha calculator.
Frequently asked questions
How do P-O fit and P-J fit differ?
P-O fit is the fit between a person and the organization (values, culture). P-J fit is the fit between a person and a specific job (needs being met, abilities matching demands).
What role does fit usually play in a model?
Usually an independent variable affecting satisfaction, engagement, commitment and turnover intention; sometimes a moderator.
Should I measure all three types of fit?
Measure only the types you have hypotheses for. Measure all three when you want to compare which predicts outcomes more strongly.
References
- Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 875–884. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.875